![]() In this comprehensive guide, we’ll be sharing how to teach text evidence to kids from different age groups, why that’s important, and how to turn it into a fun, stimulating activity, as well as give you tips on the best activities and strategies you can incorporate in your classroom or home. How to teach kids to cite evidence from literature without overwhelming them or having them lose attention? However, with such a plethora of different approaches, it’s impossible not to wonder what’s the best way to go about it. There are many strategies that will allow you to make this activity fun, meaningful, and simple to understand. As tough as they can be to teach, analyzing literature and citing evidence should be introduced right after the child makes the transition from learning to read to reading to learn. Boston: Little, Brown, 1986.Teaching literary analysis is a challenging task, but the skills kids acquire through this exercise are crucial in developing their critical thinking and deepening their reading comprehension abilities. Most of all, they are not likely to win the confidence or agreement of your readers. At worst, they reflect a narrow-minded view of the world. At best, prejudices are careless oversimplifications. We often form prejudices or accept them from others-family, friends, the media, etc.-without questioning their meaning or testing their truth. (Ex.: "Women are bad drivers.") Unlike a belief, a prejudice is testable: it can be contested and disproved on the basis of facts. (Emotional appeals can, of course, be useful if you happen to know that your audience shares those beliefs.)Īnother kind of assertion that has no place in serious argumentation is prejudice, a half-baked opinion based on insufficient or unexamined evidence. Since beliefs are inarguable, they cannot serve as the thesis of a formal argument. They cannot be disproved or even contested in a rational or logical manner. ![]() Statements such as "Capital punishment is legalized murder" are often called "opinions" because they express viewpoints, but they are not based on facts or other evidence. Unlike an opinion, a belief is a conviction based on cultural or personal faith, morality, or values. You must always let your reader know what your evidence is and how it led you to arrive at your opinion. By themselves, opinions have little power to convince. (For example, we know that millions of people go without proper medical care, and so you form the opinion that the country should institute national health insurance even though it would cost billions of dollars.) An opinion is potentially changeable-depending on how the evidence is interpreted. However, facts by themselves are worthless unless we put them in context, draw conclusions, and, thus, give them meaning.Īn opinion is a judgment based on facts, an honest attempt to draw a reasonable conclusion from factual evidence. Facts provide crucial support for the assertion of an argument. (Ex.: "World War II ended in 1945.") The truth of the fact is beyond argument if one can assume that measuring devices or records or memories are correct. This may involve numbers, dates, testimony, etc. ![]() We can determine whether it is true by researching the evidence. The usefulness and acceptability of an assertion can be improved or diminished by the nature of the assertion, depending on which of the following categories it falls into:Ī fact is verifiable. Hence, most statements we make in speaking and writing are assertions of fact, opinion, belief, or prejudice. When forming personal convictions, we often interpret factual evidence through the filter of our values, feelings, tastes, and past experiences. ![]() Distinguishing Fact, Opinion, Belief, and Prejudice
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |